mehdi rasuli; Saeed Rezayi; fateme nikkhoo; .Parviz Sharifi Daramadi
Abstract
Abstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation on the working memory components of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The statistical population of the research included all male students with ...
Read More
Abstract
The present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effectiveness of computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation on the working memory components of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The statistical population of the research included all male students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Tehran. To select a sample from among all male students suffering from attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Tehran, 30 of them were in the age range of 7 to 12 years old (students in elementary school) according to the inclusion criteria using the purposeful sampling method. They were selected as samples and were randomly divided into two experimental and control groups. The research tools included Connor's behavioral questionnaire and the Wechsler IQ memory test for children. The cognitive rehabilitation program of Yar Captain Log computer was implemented for 10 sessions of 60 minutes and twice a week for the experimental group. The results of the covariance analysis showed that the computerized cognitive rehabilitation program has improved the active memory components of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (P<0.05) and can be used as a suitable method to improve the active memory of these students.
Keywords: Computer-Aided Cognitive Rehabilitation, Working Memory, Students, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder is one of the most common neuropsychological disorders known in children and adolescents, and longitudinal studies have shown that this disorder is generally stable during development (Tandon and Perjika, 2017). Worldwide, this disorder affects about 8 to 12% of children under 12 years of age (Ronald et al., 2021). But research showed that the prevalence of this disorder among children in Iran is 10 to 12%. (Rafiei et al., 2019). This disorder of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder is associated with extensive negative consequences (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). This disorder leads to disorder in various fields and affects not only the individual but also the structure of the family and society. (Schneider et al., 2019) One of the areas in which children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder have problems and have a lot of failure is working memory (Michelini et al., 2023)
Active memory is a systematic structure that connects short-term and long-term memory functions with other cognitive and emotional dimensions. To put it more clearly, active memory means keeping information in the mind and performing continuous activities on it in the shortest possible time (Criter et al., 2022. (In general, active memory is divided into two parts: visual active memory and auditory active memory. Visual working memory is a part of fundamental function of working memory that allows temporary storage and manipulation of visual information related to an ongoing or imminent behavior or activity (Gambarota and Sessa, 2019). Active auditory memory also refers to the process of keeping sounds in the mind for short periods of time when sounds do not exist in the environment for a relatively long period of time (Kamar et al., 2016). Today, active memory as one of the most important and fundamental issues has attracted the attention of many researchers (Perez Martin et al., 2017; quoted by Fathabadi et al., 2019).
Although there is evidence of the beneficial and effective effects of stimulant drugs such as Ritalin for improving the symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and reducing cognitive problems with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, the problem is that some other evidence shows that the symptoms of this disorder recur immediately after stopping the drug, and in addition, parents avoid giving the drug to their children due to the fear of stigma and side effects of the drugs (Killo et al., 2018). Therefore, the importance of dealing with non-pharmacological treatments to improve the complications of this disorder has become more and more in the spotlight, and among them, non-invasive approaches based on computer-based cognitive rehabilitation can be mentioned to improve cognitive performance, including the working memory of these children. (Zinali and Mirzadeh, 2018)
Although many studies have pointed to the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation on improving the cognitive performance of students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and also many studies have pointed to the effectiveness of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation on improving the cognitive performance of other groups, unfortunately, the role of computer use in the cognitive rehabilitation of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder has been neglected, therefore, in view of the above, the present study fills the research gap in this field and is also important from the practical point of view, and the question of the present study is this: Is computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation effective on the working memory of students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder?
Literature Review
In line with the current research, Zare et al. (2019) showed in a research that computerized cognitive rehabilitation is effective in improving the working memory and cognitive flexibility of children with learning disabilities. Ranjbar et al. (2019) showed in a research that computer-based cognitive rehabilitation tasks improved the cognitive processes of children with executive function defects. In a research, Iriwaki et al. (2016) concluded that computerized cognitive rehabilitation has reduced the cognitive deficit of students with learning disabilities. Xiao et al. (2022) showed in a research that computerized cognitive rehabilitation improves the cognitive performance of students, and Skiankaper et al. (2022) showed in a research that computerized cognitive rehabilitation improves the cognitive function of children. In recent years, according to the advancement of the knowledge of psychologists and educational specialists, attention to children's cognitive issues, especially the search for solutions to solve children's cognitive problems, has become prominent, among which cognitive interventions for children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder are also of this rule. It is not excluded (Miranda et al., 2013)
Methodology
The research design was a semi-experimental pre-test-post-test type with a control group. The statistical population of the present study includes all male patients suffering from Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Tehran. In this research, to select a sample from among all male students suffering from attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder in Tehran, 30 people were selected as a sample according to the inclusion criteria by purposive sampling method and were randomly divided into two experimental groups and were controlled. In order to collect information and gain access to the sample community, the researcher, after obtaining a research permit from the General Directorate of Education and Education of Region 3, went to educational psychology centers and by presenting a letter of introduction and coordinating with the director of the center, the sample group of boys with Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder was selected based on psychiatric records, and after obtaining consent from their parents, Connors questionnaire (parent form) was completed to ensure the diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Results
In the current study, the sample included 30 students who were in the age range of 7-12 years and with an average of 10 years. Descriptive information on the active memory variable and its components are presented separately for groups in two situations: pre-test and post-test.
According to the results of Table 2, the average of the groups shows that the working memory scores in the post-test of the experimental group have improved compared to the pre-test scores. Covariance analysis was used to analyze the data. For this purpose, the assumptions of the analysis of the covariance test, i.e. the assumption of normality of the distribution, were checked using the Kalmogorov-Smirnov test (P>0.05) and the results of the normality of the distribution were confirmed. Levine's test was used to check the homogeneity of error variance. This test did not show any violation of this assumption. Analysis of covariance test was used for the effectiveness of computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation on working memory components of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
The results show that there is a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the variables of auditory and visual active memory (P<0.05). Considering that the average of the experimental group compared to the control group shows an improvement in the dependent variable, it can be concluded that computerized cognitive rehabilitation has led to an improvement in working memory.
Conclusion
In explaining the effectiveness of computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation on the improvement of working memory components (auditory and visual) of students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, it can be said that Captain Log cognitive rehabilitation software was used in this research because this software teaches orientation skills, response inhibition, multi-step commands, and auditory and visual memory, it can improve active auditory and visual memory in these students. Completing the tasks and games in the software requires the engagement of auditory and visual working memory, and by playing the game and moving to higher levels, the amount of this engagement increases, and with practice and repetition, it strengthens the subject's active memory. It is also possible to point out the feature based on the reinforcement of the tasks of this intervention (Nazarzadeh Giglo et al., 1400). In another explanation, it can be said: an active brain forms very important neurological connections for learning, while a brain that is not active does not create this stable and necessary neurological information. Having the ability to adjust the level of difficulty of tasks from simple to difficult increases brain activity, therefore, failure in working memory is related to dysfunction in the frontal lobe, on the other hand, Yar's cognitive rehabilitation with Captain Lockeg software can stimulate these areas (Abdelmohammadi and colleagues, 1401). For this reason, in this research, computerized cognitive rehabilitation has improved the working memory components (auditory and visual) of students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
In general, according to the findings of the current research on the effectiveness of computer-aided cognitive rehabilitation on improving working memory components (auditory and visual) of students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, it is appropriate that schools and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder treatment centers use the computerized cognitive rehabilitation package with the aim of improving the working memory components of students with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.